Website Validation- The website seems to be valid; there is an author listed and the site is associated with cnet news. The information given seems to be biased. The author is writing this article in support of his opinion of this issue.
I believe that sex offenders should be banned from social networking sites. If one child can be saved it is worth it. A childs safety is the most important thing. If we keep these people off these sites there is a lesser chance of a child being harmed however, it will not eliminate the problem. These people can find other ways to find jobs and I do not think that they deserve our pity.
Referances-
Magid, L. (2009). Social-networking ban for sex offenders:bad call?. Cnet news, Retrieved from http://news.cnet.com/8301-19518_3-10309421-238.html
(2010). Knowing what's what and whats not the 5 w's and 1 h of cyberspace. Media awarness network, Retrieved from http://www.media-awareness.ca/english/resources/special_initiatives/wa_resources/wa_shared/tipsheets/5Ws_of_cyberspace.cfm
This article seemed to be mostly based on Magid's opinion and facts did not seem very clear.
ReplyDeleteI don't think someone should be completely banned. If you saw some people have to register as a sex offender for peeing in public. Should those people be banned as well?
ReplyDeleteI think that people should be banned if they are registered as sex offenders. I feel that our kids would be safer.
ReplyDelete